By the time anyone reads this it is old news…because it happened a whole 5 days ago! What happened? Well, during a World Economic Forum (WEF) panel discussion titled “Sustainable Development Impact Meetings 2022”, while discussing the topic of “tackling disinformation”, Melissa Fleming, who is the United Nations’ Under-Secretary-General for Global Communications and is also an advisor to the World Economic Forum, confirmed to all our global masters that:
“We own the science, and we think that the world should know it, and the platforms themselves also do.”
To see both Ms. Fleming say these words and a mocking response, here’s a link
If this post is too long for your liking, I’d like to send you off with a recommendation to watch this film, “The Greatest Reset”: https://greatestreset.movie/watch
But why does it matter what some narcissistic “elite” says/thinks while cavorting with all our other “betters” who think it’s appropriate to take private jets around the world to then talk about “Sustainable Development” and “tackling disinformation”, especially around “climate change”? I mean, this WEF thing is just a bunch of blowhards who don’t impact our lives, right!?
WRONG! By their own words, their members are “the world’s top innovators, market shapers, disruptors, including niche market leaders and regional champions. They are businesses of established influence…and help facilitate the Forum’s mission of improving the state of the world.”
Yeah, right, but those are just words on a webpage. I mean, they don’t really have that much impact, right?! Well, I mean, I guess… if you don’t think Gavin Newsom, Mark Zuckerberg, Peter Thiel, Pete Buttigieg, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, Huma Abedin, Chelsea Clinton, Alexander Soros, Ibram Kendi, Paul Krugman, Larry Summers, Anderson Cooper, George Stephanapoulos, Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, Tony Blair, Justin Trudeau, Angela Merkel, Emanuel Macron, etc. are impactful people.
I mean, the link I included to the quote by Ms. Fleming specifically states that Google manipulated their search results for “climate change” to match what the UN and WEF identified as t’science. If you don’t think Google does this sh*t all the time, you’re not paying attention. And it usually takes just a shave of a few percentage points of manipulation to completely alter public perception and outcomes…
OK, fine…these asshats might be very influential, and they might lord their influence over us as if they were some sort of more advanced human or something, but at the end of the day, they really don’t cause us actual problems, right? Especially since I agree with them on most of this stuff anyway!
Um, ok, so this is where it gets hard not to scream out, “PAY ATTENTION!!!”
WHY do you think (if you do) that masks work to prevent COVID spread? WHY do you think (if you do) that “vaccines” work to prevent COVID spread? WHY do you think (if you do) that social distancing prevents COVID spread? WHY do you think (if you do) that “one COVID death is too many”? Why do you agree with the narrative being force-fed you from every direction?
Very recently we have all been subject to COVID fascism…and the vast majority willingly, and unquestionably, subjugated themselves to it!! WHY!?!?
Could it possibly be because almost every single government agency, non-governmental agencies, and mainstream media were propagating t’science instead of actual science? I may have spent more time than most when I wrote this back in April, but that means there’s even less excuse if you still live in COVIDstan now that more and more revelations are exposed and more and more time to find those revelations (if you actually look) have passed.
Do you find it weird that Klaus Schwab, leader of the WEF, somehow published a book called “COVID-19: The Great Reset” in July 2020!? You don’t just publish a book overnight, rather it takes at least months even after you write it…so, if COVID started in Dec 2019, how the hell does a “never let a crisis go to waste” book (when we didn’t even consider it a crisis until, what, like February) get published by July?
Do you find it weird that Biden, Trudeau, Klaus Schwab, and so many others parrot the same phrases, like Build Back Better? Or that they find these disasters to be an “opportunity”?
Do you find it weird that rugged individualism, American exceptionalism, free market capitalism, and religious beliefs are demonized when they used to be esteemed?
“The pandemic is over”, says Biden. But if so, why is his Administration still kicking soldiers out of the Armed Forces if they don’t get a COVID “vaccine”, forcing federal workers to get a COVID “vaccine”, and using Emergency Powers to illegally forgive student loans?
If you agree with this COVIDstan stuff…WHY!?
Sweden has stopped vaccinating those under 18
Denmark has stopped vaccinating those under 18
Spike protein and lipid nanoparticles transmitted via breast milk
And on, and on, and on, and on… The links I provided are just the tip of the iceberg. If you actually look, you can easily find massive quantities of information to help you balance out the misinformation that is force-fed us through the mainstream options. I don’t know why the mainstream media thinks they have to hold the line on the leftist (not liberal, but leftist) narrative, but they sure do toe the line. Thank God that most people are at least protecting their children from this “vaccine”.
I maintain:
if you’re over 65 and unhealthy, you should probably “vaccinate” and “boost”
if you’re over 65 and healthy, do your own research
if you’re 50-65 and unhealthy, do your research
if you’re 50-65 and healthy, you probably should not get vaccinated
if you’re under 50 and unhealthy, do your research
if you’re under 50 and healthy, you should not get vaccinated
So, if we are so easily manipulated about COVID, when the signs were all around us by Winter 2020 at the very latest that it was so overblown as to be ridiculous, shoving it down your throats with a “take that and LIKE IT!”, how can you think you couldn’t be manipulated for whatever other reason is “needed”, you smelly pleb?
Take “climate change”. I remember when it was called “global warming”. And before that, I remember we were told an “ice age” was coming. I guess when you get the ice age so wrong that you then say hellfire is coming, but then get that wrong, so what do you have left to claim other than “climate change”!? Every single prediction has been absolute bunk! (Except when they cook the books). It’s friggin’ ridiculous when you think about it.
Is the climate changing? Of course! Has the climate been in a state of change ever since before anyone can say? Of course! What do humans do in the face of adversity? Adapt!
Are humans impacting the current “climate change”? Probably. But let me ask you some questions:
How much is the sun impacting “climate change”?
How much is the earth’s molten interior impacting “climate change”?
How much are miniscule changes in the moon’s orbit and the corresponding impact to the earth’s axis impacting “climate change”?
How much is human activity impacting “climate change”?
The obvious answer is WE DON’T KNOW! Let’s say that humans are significantly impacting “climate change”: so what? There was much more carbon in the atmosphere in previous periods of the earth’s existence, and the earth still exists now, so obviously it didn’t ruin the planet! If the sea levels rise, what, do you think those people who live on the coasts will just stay put and drown? The truth of the matter is more people die every year from cold than from heat, so just from that I could make an argument that “climate change” (at least the kind that warms the earth) is a good thing. Oh yeah, and you may recall from grade school science class that the plants that produce the food we eat depend on something: carbon dioxide.
Whatever percentage humans are impacting “climate change”, we will adapt. No one is out to ruin the environment; technological, ethical, and scientific advances, as they have been doing for thousands of years, will continue to improve our lives and our environment. Thinking that humans are a scourge to the planet is blithering idiocy.
You want to get to brass tacks on the matter:
You taking my tax dollars to subsidize your buying an EV that has a battery that is manufactured by the mining output of child slaves and is powered by electricity mostly produced by fossil fuels and which weighs a ton-and-a-half more than a regular car so it wears out the roads faster and then has a huge, heavy-metal battery that will probably be disposed of in a facility that leaches toxic chemicals into the ground water we drink does NOT make you a better person than me! Oh yeah, and I am being more friendly to the environment by driving the tires off my 30-year old vehicle instead of purchasing a new one every 5-10 years than you are in purchasing a new EV.
Providing COAL stoves and COAL to all the world’s poor, who live in areas without electrical grid infrastructure, so they can stop burning wood and dung will do MORE to reduce carbon output than any other measure. Oh yeah, and not having to scrounge for wood every day will immensely increase opportunity to put that time to better, more efficient and effective, use.
Like it or not, the USA is the cleanest producer of coal, oil, and natural gas, and we have a shit-ton of it. Oh yeah, and we (presumably) are not a dictatorship using energy as a weapon.
Wind turbines take up a shit-ton of acreage and use a massive amount of concrete, typically in nature-sensitive areas. Oh yeah, and they are killing raptors (especially putting the golden eagle back onto the endangered list). Oh yeah, and they produce zero electricity when the wind doesn’t blow or when it blows too hard.
Solar farms take up radically more shit-ton of acreage than wind farms, typically in even more nature-sensitive areas, killing reptiles and plants. Oh yeah, and they produce zero electricity when the sun don’t shine.
If you REALLY want to be environmentally friendly in our production of electricity, you will get off your duff and promote nuclear energy as the most efficient, cleanest, and most stable option we have. Get over it, man, nuclear is our BEST OPTION.
So why did I put in quotes (““) the words “vaccine” and “climate change” repeatedly? Because I am identifying they are words whose definitions do not mean what we all understand the individual words to actually mean. Just like “racism” and “color blind” no longer mean what you always knew them to mean.
The COVID “vaccines” are not what you expect of a vaccine. Heck they probably even produce negative efficacy!
Along with “vaccine”, the term “climate change” is held out as a cudgel: you WILL agree with us, you smelly pleb, or you will suffer the consequences.
No one owns the science. NO ONE. That’s not how "science works! You have a hypothesis, you test it, and you confirm it or not. Then you take those results and move onto the next hypothesis. And you don’t have to be an expert or a scientist to consume various, sometimes contrary, pieces of information in order to use them to establish an informed opinion. The problem we are facing is that we are being told there is no other thing, that “the science” (what I call t’science) is settled. Well that’s a bunch of baloney-sausage! Science continues to evolve and identify and uncover and reach new observational conclusions. Putting your head in the sand is unworthy of your dignity as a person.